Developing the proposed platform first
The initial focus is electromagnetic fields, sound and felt vibration. Body-signal recording and AI analysis are intended to investigate individual responses and adapt applications within predefined programme limits. These components are the proposed focus of the first research prototype.
Georges Lakhovsky: considering multiple frequencies
Georges Lakhovsky, an inventor working in France, offers another historical reference. His multiwave oscillator uses nested open rings of different sizes to produce several electromagnetic wavelengths. The technical idea is to excite different resonances together: conductive structures respond differently according to their construction.
FR732276A and US1962565A, granted in 1934, document this approach. US2351055A (1944) describes a tube-based construction for generating or conducting several wavelengths in a more compact device. The later publication EP2862596A1 also refers to Lakhovsky's multiwave antenna.
A possible FABS AI research question is how individual-frequency responses differ from responses to defined combinations. This connects historical technology with planned individual body-signal analysis. It is our interpretation for possible future research, not a confirmed FABS AI function or effect.
Historical inspiration, independent development
FABS AI is conceived as an independent platform. Copper coils generate time-varying electromagnetic fields, speakers produce sound and transducers deliver mechanical vibration through the couch. Their programmable coordination and assessment alongside body signals may offer development value through individual response analysis and controlled adaptation under human supervision.
Electrical and acoustic frequencies differ: the same numerical frequency does not make an electromagnetic field equivalent to a sound wave. FABS AI is therefore not the historical high-frequency multiwave oscillator. Tesla and Lakhovsky provide inspiration; recreating their devices is not the development goal.
Lakhovsky's historical biological resonance and therapeutic ideas are treated as hypotheses. Patents do not replace clinical evidence. Adopting his device construction is not decided; extensions would undergo separate safety, measurement and third-party rights assessment.
Sources: Multiwave oscillator, FR732276A ↗ · Multiple wavelengths, US1962565A (1934) ↗ · Tube construction, US2351055A (1944) ↗ · Later reference, EP2862596A1 ↗
Assessing existing patents carefully
Historical patents describe electrotherapeutic devices with Tesla coils; newer publications cover Tesla coils for cell stimulation and frequency-controlled therapy devices. They are relevant prior-art references, not scientific evidence of effectiveness.
Before developing a high-frequency extension, detailed patent review is planned, covering claims, current protection and third-party rights. Patentability and freedom to implement without infringing others' rights are separate questions. These documents are research starting points, not a substitute for review.
Patent references: Tesla: high-frequency currents, US568180A (1896) ↗ · Historical electrotherapeutic device, US1012326A ↗ · Cell therapy or stimulation device, DE112020006034B4 ↗ · Frequency-controlled therapy device, WO2015007840A1 ↗